Ms R Sutherland v Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A.
2214024/2023
- Decision date
- 20 Jan 2025
- Published
- 29 Jan 2025
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK
Disability Discrimination
Flexible Working
Public Interest Disclosure
Sex Discrimination
Victimisation Discrimination
Judgment PDF (134 pages · 496 chunks)
View PDF
Case Number: 2214024/2023
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms R Sutherland Respondent: Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A. Heard at: in person at the Central London Tribunal On: 26, 27 and 30 September and 1 and 2 October 2024 and in chambers on 6, 7 and 8 November 2024 and for a half day on 10 January 2025 and full day on 20 January 2025. Before: Employment Judge Woodhead Mr M Simon Mr S McLaughlin Appearances For the Claimant: Mrs M...
JUDGMENT WITH REASONS The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that:
1. The complaints pursuant to Section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) (flexible working requests) are not well founded and are dismissed.
2. From 1 November 2022 the Claimant was a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of her mental health impairment (it was not disputed that she was also disabled because of asthma throughout the claim period).
491 more chunks not shown.