2214024/2023

Ms R Sutherland v Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A.

Decision date
20 Jan 2025
Published
29 Jan 2025
Country
England and Wales
Source
GOV.UK ↗
Disability Discrimination Flexible Working Public Interest Disclosure Sex Discrimination Victimisation Discrimination

Judgment · 134 pages · 496 indexed sections

View PDF ↗
Case Number: 2214024/2023
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms R Sutherland Respondent: Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A. Heard at: in person at the Central London Tribunal On: 26, 27 and 30 September and 1 and 2 October 2024 and in chambers on 6, 7 and 8 November 2024 and for a half day on 10 January 2025 and full day on 20 January 2025. Before: Employment Judge Woodhead Mr M Simon Mr S McLaughlin Appearances For the Claimant: Mrs M...
JUDGMENT WITH REASONS The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that:
1. The complaints pursuant to Section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) (flexible working requests) are not well founded and are dismissed.
2. From 1 November 2022 the Claimant was a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of her mental health impairment (it was not disputed that she was also disabled because of asthma throughout the claim period).

491 more sections not shown.