← All cases

Ms R Sutherland v Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A.

2214024/2023

Decision date
20 Jan 2025
Published
29 Jan 2025
Country
England and Wales
Source
GOV.UK
Disability Discrimination Flexible Working Public Interest Disclosure Sex Discrimination Victimisation Discrimination

Judgment PDF (134 pages · 496 chunks)

View PDF
Case Number: 2214024/2023
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms R Sutherland Respondent: Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A. Heard at: in person at the Central London Tribunal On: 26, 27 and 30 September and 1 and 2 October 2024 and in chambers on 6, 7 and 8 November 2024 and for a half day on 10 January 2025 and full day on 20 January 2025. Before: Employment Judge Woodhead Mr M Simon Mr S McLaughlin Appearances For the Claimant: Mrs M...
JUDGMENT WITH REASONS The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that:
1. The complaints pursuant to Section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) (flexible working requests) are not well founded and are dismissed.
2. From 1 November 2022 the Claimant was a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of her mental health impairment (it was not disputed that she was also disabled because of asthma throughout the claim period).

491 more chunks not shown.