Mr A Harbhajanka v Shell UK Ltd

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000892/2025 Held in Aberdeen on 3, 6 & 7 October 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A Harbhajanka Claimant Represented by Mr M O’Carroll, Counsel Shell U.K. Limited Respondent Represented by Ms S Jones, Solicitor

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Tribunal finds as follows: (One) that the email sent by the claimant on the 26 June to Mr Julian Rippiner did not amount to a Protected Disclosure. (Two) that the actions of the claimant by raising the issue of the editing of the EPL with Mr Julian Rippiner on the 5 December and in his email to him dated 5 December 2023 did not amount to a Protected Discl...

REASONS

1. The claimant in his ET1 sought findings that he had suffered various detriments arising from two Protected Interest Disclosures set out in his ET1. 8000892/2025 Page 2

2. The claims were resisted and the respondent company argued that what the claimant had said or “done” did not amount in law to Protected Interest Disclosures and in any event he had not suffered any detriment from taking the action he had.