Mr D Challenger v Panton McLeod Ltd

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Case No: 8000503/2024 issued following Open Preliminary Hearing Held on the Cloud Based Video Platform on 11 November 2024 10 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno 15 Mr D Challenger Claimant In Person 20 Panton McLeod Ltd Respondent Represented by: 25 Mr Glass, Solicitor 30

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is:- 35 (First) That the claimant was a person possessing the protected characteristic of Disability, in terms of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 (“the EqA”), at the material time for the purposes of his complaints, namely th th in the period 8 to 26 January 2024, by reason only of his mental 40 impairment (medical c...

ETZ4(WR) 8000503/2024 Page 2 claims should proceed to a Final Hearing subject to further Case Management Direction as appropriate. (Second) The claimant’s complaints of Disability Discrimination, in so far as 5 founded upon possession of the protected characteristic of Disability, at the material time, and said to arise by reason of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”), are dismiss...

REASONS 25

1. This case called on the Cloud Based Video Platform for Open Preliminary Hearing in terms of Judge Jones’s Case Management Orders of 20 August th st