3200141/2023
Mrs H Mackley v MAG Ltd Stansted Airport
- Decision date
- 19 Jun 2024
- Published
- 24 Jul 2024
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK ↗
Unfair Dismissal
Judgment · 9 pages · 13 indexed sections
View PDF ↗
Case No: 3200141/2023
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs H Mackley Respondent: MAG Limited Stansted Airport Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 16 April 2024 Before: Employment Judge Jones Representation Claimant: in person Respondent: Mr R Mitchell, Solicitor
JUDGMENT The Claimant’s application to amend her claim is refused.
REASONS This claim was issued on 19 January 2023. In that claim, the Claimant makes complaint of constructive unfair dismissal - following a restructure which she described as a sham. It is her case that in the restructure she was treated less favourably than a younger male employee. She also complains of direct sex discrimination and age discrimination. The Respondent submitted its response to...
1. She relied on Sam Lomax and Lee Williams as her comparators as they are male and in the 30 – 40 age group whereas she is female and in the 50 – 60 age group. It is her case that Mr Williams does the same job that she did at the Respondent and that Mr Lomax was doing the job that she took over, was paid at Band 5, as she was before her pay was decreased. 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 M...
8 more sections not shown.