4105318/2023

Mr M Scaresbrook v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs

Decision date
22 Oct 2024
Published
12 Sep 2024
Country
Scotland
Source
GOV.UK ↗
Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction from Wages

Judgment · 69 pages · 270 indexed sections

View PDF ↗
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105318/2023 5 Held in Glasgow on 2, 3, 4 & 5 September 2024 Employment Judge: J D Young Mr M Scaresbrook Claimant 10 In Person Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs Respondent 15 Represented by: Mr C McCracken - Solicitor
JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is that;- 20 1. The claimant was not a disabled person at the relevant time within the meaning of s6 of the Equality Acy 2010 and so the claim of discrimination arising from disability does not succeed;
2. The claimant was not unfairly dismissed in terms of s98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; 25 3. The claim of wrongful dismissal does not succeed.
REASONS Introduction
1. In this case, the claimant presented a claim to the Employment Tribunal which at the date of this final hearing, consisted of a claim of unfair dismissal; 30 wrongful dismissal (notice pay); and discrimination arising from disability. The respondent did not concede that the claimant was a disabled person at the relevant time and in any event denied there had been any discrimination 4105318/2...

265 more sections not shown.