Mr R Faulds v Department for Work and Pensions

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103907/2023 Held in Glasgow via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on 16 January 2024 5 Employment Judge J Hendry Mr Robert Faulds Claimant Represented by: Ms L Lindsay - Solicitor 10 Department for Work and Pensions Respondent Represented by: Mr R Ashmore - 15 Solicitor

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The claim for unlawful deductions not being well founded is dismissed.

REASONS 20 1. The claimant in his ET1 sought findings that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from his wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In short, his position was that he had been promoted and on return to his substantive post, that promotion had not been recognised. He had been paid at the rate applicable to his earlier lower paid role and 25 accordingly under...

2. The Tribunal heard evidence from the claimant on his own behalf. It also considered the documents contained in the inventories of productions lodged by the claimant and respondent. Issues 5 3. The issues revolved around the claimant working for DVSA for a period on loan from his employers the DWP. The list of issues was put in this way: a. Was the claimant entitled to any ongoing entitlement...

4. The parties prepared a draft statement of agreed facts. These have been incorporated these into the findings in fact. Findings of fact 20 5. The claimant has been employed by the civil service from 1 May 1997. He worked as an AO with the DWP. His employment is continuing.