Mr R Niwas v Moet Spice Ltd

IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) 5 Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Case No: 8000330/2024 Issued th Following Open Preliminary Hearing Heard at Edinburgh on the 5 of July 2024 10 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno 15 Mr R Niwas Claimant In Person 20 Moet Spice Limited Respondent Represented by: Ms D McGuire, Solicitor 25

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL 30 The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is:- (First) That the Tribunal lacks Jurisdiction, by reason of Time Bar, to consider the claimant’s complaints of; 35 (a) having suffered detriment in consequence of making a protected disclosure and

ETZ4(WR) 8000330/2024 Page 2 (b) the claimant’s claim for an additional balance of holiday pay assertedly accrued but untaken by the claimant as at the Effective Date of Termination of his employment; and, 5 (c) the said claims are dismissed for want of Jurisdiction; (Second) That the Tribunal lacks Jurisdiction, by reason of Time Bar, to consider the claimant’s complaints of Harassment relatin...

NOTE 30 1. The Tribunal records the respondent’s representative’s concession, made in the course of Case Management conducted at the outset of the Hearing, that the respondent concedes that a sum of £415 net of PAYE and National Insurance deductions is due and payable to the claimant, by way of holiday pay (compensation for accrued but as at the Effective Date of Termination of th 35 Employment...

3. The claimant appeared In Person. The Respondent Company was represented by Ms McGuire, Solicitor. 10 The Issue