S Naik v University of Aberdeen and others

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 4111704/21 (V) Heard by means of CVP on 4 April 2022 10 Employment Judge J Young 15 Sawan Naik Claimant Represented by: Mr G Singh, Solicitor 20 University of Aberdeen 1 Respondent Represented by: Mr N Maclean, Solicitor 25 nd David Walton 2 Respondent Represented by: Mr N Maclean, Solicitor 30 Hulda Sveinsdottir 3 Respondent Represented by: Mr N Macle...

ETZ4(WR) 4111704/2021 Page 2 Mr N Maclean, Solicitor 5 Rob Donelson 6 Respondent Represented by: Mr N Maclean, Solicitor Debbie Dyker 7 Respondent 10 Represented by: Mr N Maclean, Solicitor Iain Harold 8 Respondent 15 Represented by: Mr N Maclean, Solicitor Brian Henderson 9 Respondent Represented by: 20 Mr N Maclean, Solicitor Karen E McArdle 10 Respondent Represented by: Mr N Maclean, Solicit...

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is that:- 5 1. The claim of victimisation under s27 of the Equality Act 2010 is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 (“the Tribunal Rules”).

2. The claim of direct discrimination under s13 of the Equality Act 2010 10 specified at (iv) of Table A within the Further and Better Particulars lodged by the claimant (“Table A”) is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules.

3. The claims of harassment under s26 of the Equality Act 2010 specified at (i) (vii) and (x) of Table B within the Further and Better particulars lodged by 15 the claimant (“Table B”) are struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules..