J Woodcock v Balfour Beatty Group Employment Ltd
6004463/2024
- Decision date
- 23 Aug 2024
- Published
- 4 Sep 2024
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK
Interim Relief
Judgment PDF (14 pages · 23 chunks)
View PDF
Case Number: 6004463/2024
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Josh Woodcock Respondent: Balfour Beatty Group Employment Limited Heard at: East London Hearing Centre (by Cloud Video Platform) On: 16 July 2024 Before: Employment Judge Gardiner Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Declan O’Dempsey, Counsel
JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that:- The Claimant’s application for interim relief is not well founded and is therefore dismissed.
REASONS Introduction
1. From 30 August 2022 until his dismissal on 17 June 2024, the Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a Signalling Supervisor. He claims that this dismissal was automatically unfair, arguing that the reason or the principal reason was that he made protected disclosures. He lodged Employment Tribunal proceedings on 23 June 2024 applying for interim relief under Section 128 Employment Rights...
18 more chunks not shown.