Mr M Heinl and Ms H Laikko v Moving Brands Ltd and others
2204235/2021 and 2204238/2021
- Decision date
- 22 Jul 2024
- Published
- 7 Aug 2024
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK
Breach of Contract
Public Interest Disclosure
Unfair Dismissal
Victimisation Discrimination
Judgment PDF (197 pages · 1083 chunks)
View PDF
Case Numbers: 2204235/2021 & 2204238/2021
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants: (1) Mr M Heinl (2) Ms H Laikko Respondents: (1) Moving Brands Limited (2) Year 15 Limited (3) Mr B Wolstenholme (4) Mr G Wolstenholme (5) Mr J Toppin (6) Ms C-A Kyosti
JUDGMENT Heard at: London Central (by Cloud Video Platform) On: 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 September 2022, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18 October 2023, 2, 3 and 4 April 2024, 17 July 2024 Before: Employment Judge Joffe Ms S Campbell Mr A Adolphus Appearances For the claimants: Mr J Susskind, counsel For the respondent: Mr P Strelitz, counsel
JUDGMENT
1. The claimants’ claims of ordinary unfair dismissal (section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996) are well-founded and are upheld against the first respondent.
1078 more chunks not shown.