← All cases

Mr C Milloy v Telecom Service Centres Ltd (T/a WebHelp UK)

8000042/2023

Decision date
29 Nov 2023
Published
19 Dec 2023
Country
Scotland
Source
GOV.UK
Disability Discrimination Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism Victimisation Discrimination Working Time Regulations

Judgment PDF (76 pages · 195 chunks)

View PDF
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000042/2023 5 Preliminary Hearing held in public at Glasgow on 14 August 2023 and conducted remotely using the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) ; and parties’ further written representations dated 16 and 17 August 2023, considered in chambers, without the attendance of parties, by private deliberation on 21 10 August and 22 November 2023 Employment Judge Ian ...
JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The reserved judgment of the Employment Tribunal, having heard both parties’ 25 submissions at the CVP Preliminary Hearing, and having then reserved judgment to be given later, and having resumed consideration of the case, in private deliberation in chambers, and there considered parties’ closing submissions on time bar and the claimant’s opposed application ...
REASONS Introduction 20 1. This case called before me as an Employment Judge sitting alone on Monday, 14 August 2023, for a 1-day public Preliminary Hearing to be conducted remotely using the Cloud Video Platform (CVP), previously intimated to both parties’ representatives by the Tribunal, by a Notice of Preliminary Hearing dated 12 July 2023. 25 2. An earlier CVP Preliminary Hearing, listed on...
3. A further, amended Notice of Preliminary Hearing was issued on 11 August 2023, on my instructions, for this sitting of the Tribunal. This case was listed to determine the following issues: “time bar and claimant’s opposed application to amend the claim”. The circumstances surrounding that 5 amendment application from the claimant, and the respondents’ opposition to it, are detailed below, la...
4. As I indicated at the start of this Hearing, the additional text in that amended Notice of Preliminary Hearing saying “employment status and case management issues” was inserted by the Tribunal listing clerk in error, as 10 both parties agreed that there is no disputed preliminary issue of employment status in this case. Background

190 more chunks not shown.