Ms T Ball v Hexarad Group Ltd

IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH 5 Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Combined Case Numbers 4105691/2023 & 4107258/2023 Heard at Edinburgh before a full Tribunal on nd rd th th th st 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , and 6 September 2024 with Deliberation on 31 October 2024 10 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Tribunal Member Ms L Grime Tribunal Member Mr T Lithgow 15 Ms T Ball Claimant In Per...

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL 35 The unanimous Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is:- (First) By reason of concession by the respondent, that at the material time for the purposes of her complaints, that is in the period from 12 February to 18th August and to 8 thSeptember 2023, the claimant was a person 40 possessing the protected characteristic of Disability in terms of section 6 of

ETZ4(WR) 4105691/2023 & 4107258/2023 Page 2 the Equality Act 2010 (“EqA”), by reason of the diagnosed conditions of Autism Spectrum Disorder (“ASD”) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”). 5 (Second) That at the material time for the purposes of her complaints, that is in the period from 12 February to 18 August 2023 and to 8 September 2023 inclusive, the claimant was not a perso...

REASONS 30 1. This case called before a full Tribunal at Edinburgh, on 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 andh th 6 September 2024, for a Final Hearing to which there had been reserved for determination after the hearing of the evidence the Preliminary Issues of:- (a) Jurisdiction, by reason of asserted Time Bar; and 35 (b) It being a matter of concession on the part of the respondents for the purposes of the Heari...

2. Parties lodged a Joint (Hearing) Bundle extending to some 1043 pages to which some supplementary and more legible copy pages were added, on the respondent’s application the claimant not objecting, at the outset of the 15 Hearing.