Mrs M H Cruickshank v Campbell Connon, Solicitors and Others

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 4100510/2023 Held at Aberdeen on 4 December 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie 10 Mrs Mandy Hazel Cruickshank Claimant Represented by Ms A Neukirch, 15 Solicitor 20 Campbell Connon, Solicitors, & Respondent David Morrison & John Fraser Hendry, No Appearance The Partners thereof 25 30

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Judgment of the Tribunal is that:- 35 1. the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of Five Thousand, Four Hundred and Eighty-Three Pounds and Sixteen Pence (£5,483.16), as a redundancy payment; 2. the claim under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is well-founded and the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of Six Hundred and Twenty 40 ...

E.T. Z4 (WR) S/4100510/2023 Page 2 3. the claim under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 is well-founded and the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of Two Hundred and Three Pounds and Ten Pence (£203.10), as accrued annual leave; 5 4. the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of Two Thousand, Four Hundred and Thirty-Six Pounds and Ninety-Six Pence (£2,436....

REASONS 15 Introduction

1. The claimant, Mandy Cruickshank, brought various claims, following the termination of her employment on 24 October 2022, due to the appointment of a Judicial Factor to her employer, the firm of Campbell Connon, and the 20 closure of its business. The respondent had not submitted an ET3 Response Form. The case proceeded on an undefended basis. The evidence