Miss C M J Innes v Campbell Connon, Solicitors and Others

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 4100508/2023 Held at Aberdeen on 4 December 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie 10 Miss Carol Mary Jean Innes Claimant Represented by, Miss A Neukirch, 15 Solicitor Campbell Connon, Solicitors, Respondent & David Morrison & John Fraser Hendry, No Appearance 20 The Partners thereof 25

30 JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Judgment of the Tribunal is that:- 1. the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of Six Thousand, Five 35 Hundred and Forty-Two Pounds and Thirty-Four Pence (£6,542.34), as a redundancy payment; 2. the claim under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act is well-founded and the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of Eight Hundred and Forty-

E.T. Z4 (WR) S/4100508/2023 Page 2 Seven Pounds and Eighty-Three Pence (£847.83), as unlawful deductions from wages; 3. the claim under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 is 5 well-founded and the respondents shall pay to the claimant the sum of One Thousand, Eight Hundred and Ninety Pounds (£1,890.00), as a payment in lieu of annual leave; 4. the respondent shall pay to t...

REASONS 20 Introduction

1. The claimant, Carol Innes, brought various claims following the termination of her employment on 24 October 2022, due to the appointment of a Judicial Factor to her employer, the legal firm of Campbell Connon, and the closure 25 of its business. The respondent had not submitted an ET3 Response Form. The case proceeded on an undefended basis. The evidence