B M Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 8001497/2024 Held in Edinburgh on 1, 2, 3 and 22 October 2025 10 Employment Judge M Sutherland B M Kelly The Claimant Represented by 15 Ms N Cunningham, Counsel Instructed by Gunnercooke SCO LLP 20 Leonardo UK Limited Respondent Represented by Ms S Tanner, 25 King’s Counsel Instructed by Burness Paull LLP 30

JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The judgment of the Tribunal is that the complaints of harassment related to sex, direct sex discrimination and indirect sex discrimination do not succeed and are 35 accordingly dismissed.

E.T. Z4 (WR) Case No. 8001497/2024 Page 2

REASONS 5 The following table of contents is provided for the reasons in this judgment: Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................................4 Terminology and abbreviations..................................................................................................4 List of Issues..........

2. In summary her complaints were that the respondent’s toilet access policy (permitting access based upon asserted gender rather than sex) amounted to unwanted conduct related to sex which had the prohibited effect 20 (harassment); amounted to less favourable treatment because of sex (direct discrimination); and put women to a particular disadvantage in comparison with men which was not object...