A S Stoica v Emplink Ltd
2219341/2024
- Decision date
- 7 Dec 2024
- Published
- 24 Dec 2024
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK
Breach of Contract
Contract of Employment
Unfair Dismissal
Unlawful Deduction from Wages
Working Time Regulations
Written Pay Statement
Judgment PDF (11 pages · 22 chunks)
View PDF
Case Number 2219341/2024
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Adrian Stefan Stoica v Emplink Limited Heard at: London Central (in person) On: 6 December 2024 Before: Employment Judge P Klimov (sitting alone) Appearances: For the Claimant: no present or represented For the Respondent: Mr T Goslar, director
JUDGMENT The claim is struck out under Rule 37(1)(b) the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, because the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by the claimant has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious. Reasons Introduction
1. Mr Stoica is a serial litigant.He has presented numerous claims against different respondents, in London Central, Watford and other Employment Tribunals. It appears the common feature of his claims is that after a very short period of time working for a respondent, he submits a money claim for arrears of pay, notice pay, holiday pay, and other payments, together with a complaint of unfair di...
2. The other unfortunate feature of Mr Stoica’s approach to litigation is that he is intemperate and rude in his communications with the Tribunal’s staff. Judging by the respondents’ responses to his claims he uses the same style of communication with their staff too.
17 more chunks not shown.